Adisty Aulia Rosadi, . (2026) TANGGUNG JAWAB JAKSA SEBAGAI PEMEGANG ASAS DOMINUS LITIS DALAM MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
|
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (15kB) |
|
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (621kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (337kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (371kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (289kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (453kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (199kB) |
|
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (273kB) |
|
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (153kB) |
|
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (336kB) |
|
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (13MB) |
|
|
Text
ARTIKEL.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (429kB) |
Abstract
This research examines the responsibility of prosecutors as holders of the dominus litis principle in realizing substantive justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The focus of the study is directed at the limitations in regulating prosecutorial authority under the 1981 KUHAP and the direction of strengthening the prosecutorial role under the 2025 KUHAP. Normatively, the 1981 KUHAP has recognized the position of prosecutors as controllers of criminal cases; however, such authority remains limited and is generally exercised only after the completion of the investigation stage. This condition results in the prosecutorial role being largely administrative and corrective in nature, thereby limiting its effectiveness in safeguarding material truth and the quality of evidence from the early stages of a case. The 2025 KUHAP introduces a strengthened application of the dominus litis principle by expanding prosecutorial involvement from the investigation stage, enhancing substantive coordination with investigators, and reducing procedural formalism, which conceptually broadens the responsibility of prosecutors as comprehensive controllers of criminal cases. Nevertheless, the expansion of such authority also creates an urgent need for effective oversight mechanisms to prevent potential abuse of discretion and to uphold the principle of checks and balances. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the strengthening of the dominus litis principle can achieve substantive justice only if it is accompanied by proportional regulation of authority, transparent and accountable oversight, and the reinforcement of prosecutorial integrity and independence within the criminal justice system.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil : 2210611316] [Pembimbing : Bambang Waluyo] [Ketua Penguji : Abdul Kholiq] [Penguji 1 : Rosalia Dika Agustanti] [Penguji 2 : Bambang Waluyo] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Public Prosecutor, Dominus Litis, Substantive Justice |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
| Depositing User: | ADISTY AULIA ROSADI |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Apr 2026 08:55 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Apr 2026 08:55 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/42551 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
