UPAYA HUKUM BAGI PELAKU USAHA YANG TIDAK MENERIMA PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION OF SINGAPORE

Hutami Fadliany Zakaria, . (2023) UPAYA HUKUM BAGI PELAKU USAHA YANG TIDAK MENERIMA PUTUSAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION OF SINGAPORE. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (224kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (882kB)
[img] Text
BAB I.pdf
Download (382kB)
[img] Text
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (382kB)
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (492kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (410kB)
[img] Text
BAB V.pdf
Download (231kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (251kB)
[img] Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (225kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (784kB)
[img] Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (7MB)
[img] Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (460kB)

Abstract

KPPU is an independent institution that can be said to have a very broad jurisdiction, including the judiciary. Among the many powers possessed by the KPPU, there is one that clarifies the KPPU's position as an independent government institution with a judicial function, namely the power to make decisions and formulate decisions related to losses to other business owners or the general public. The research method applied is normative juridical, namely a research method that examines theories, concepts and legislation. This research will also discuss the implementation of decisions by the KPPU in cases of unfair business competition as well as a comparison of legal remedies carried out by business people if they do not accept the results of decisions from KPPU in Indonesia and CCCS in Singapore. The results found in this study are that the KPPU is not a judicial institution but a supervisory party to the implementation of Law no. 5 of 1999, so that the KPPU does not have the authority to be able to carry out the execution of its own decisions but must request an execution order against the District Court. If the entrepreneur rejects the KPPU's decision, an objection can be submitted to the District Court and an appeal to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile in Singapore, an objection can be submitted to the CAB. Those who can then submit an appeal to the High Court and cassation to the Court of Appeal.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information: [No.Panggil: 1810611012] [Pembimbing: Imam Haryanto] [Ketua Penguji : Suherman] [Penguji 1: Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat] [Penguji 2: Imam Haryanto]
Uncontrolled Keywords: Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition, Decision, Legal Action
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1)
Depositing User: Hutami Fadliany Zakaria
Date Deposited: 06 Feb 2023 08:18
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2023 08:18
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/23278

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item