Reni Ayu Wulandari, . (2024) DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PUTUSAN DI BAWAH MINIMUM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA. Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (249kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (905kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (399kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (341kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (262kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (431kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (166kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (144kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (592kB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (19MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (797kB) |
Abstract
This research was conducted to explain the disparity of judges' decisions regarding decisions below the minimum in narcotics crime cases. The main problem in this study is the consideration of judges in deciding narcotics cases that cause sentencing disparities and determining appropriate sentencing criteria that can be used as judges' considerations in deciding narcotics cases so that sentencing disparities do not occur in the future. The disparity of criminal decisions has the meaning of unequal punishment of convicts in the same case or cases with almost the same level of crime, whether committed jointly or not without justifiable basis. This study aims to find out and analyze the basis for judges' considerations in imposing criminal decisions on perpetrators of narcotics crimes at the 5 (five) District Court; Knowing the factors that influence the judge's decision against the perpetrators of criminal acts, especially those who violate Article 112 paragraph 1 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. The data used is secondary data in the form of a judge's decision. The analytical approach used is the case approach and the concept of criminal law. The results of this study indicate that in deciding cases judges use evidence as stated in the Criminal Procedure Code. The factors that influence the judge's decision include three things, namely: the legal factor itself, the perpetrator factor and the judge concerned.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Tesis) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2110622056] [Pembimbing: Handoyo Prasetyo] [Ketua Penguji : Beniharmoni Harefa] [Penguji 1: Slamet Tri Wahyudi] [Penguji 2: Handoyo Prasetyo] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Disparity, Crime, Consideration of judges, Punishment, Narcotics. |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2) |
| Depositing User: | RENI AYU WULANDARI |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Aug 2024 04:02 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Aug 2024 04:02 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/33323 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |