COMPARISON OF REGULATORY SUBSTANTIVE EXAMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN IN FOOD PACKAGING DRAWINGS: An Indonesian and Japanese Study

Laila Fauziyyah, . (2025) COMPARISON OF REGULATORY SUBSTANTIVE EXAMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN IN FOOD PACKAGING DRAWINGS: An Indonesian and Japanese Study. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 11 (4). pp. 98-113. ISSN 2614-1485

Text 2210611392_ArtikelKI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (264kB)

Abstract

Protection of industrial designs for food packaging is vital to preserve originality and legal certainty. In Indonesia, substantive examination remains reactive triggered only by third-party objections during the publication period creating potential uncertainty, as seen in the red ginger drink packaging dispute between PT Aneka Boga Citra and PT Total Asri Sumber Alam. In contrast, Japan applies a full examination from the outset to assess novelty and originality. Using a normative juridical method (comparative approach and case studies), this study finds that full examination effectively strengthens protection and prevents disputes. This research recommends that Indonesia must adopt a Hybrid Substantive Examination Model combining rigorous expert review with AI technology

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	[No. Panggil : 2210611392] [Pembimbing : Muthia Sakti] [Penguji 1 : Taupiqqurrahman] [Penguji 2 : Ema Nurkhaerani]
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Industrial Design, Substantive Examination, Comparative Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1)
Depositing User:	LAILA FAUZIYYAH
Date Deposited:	26 Mar 2026 06:34
Last Modified:	26 Mar 2026 06:34
URI:	http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/42017

Available Versions of this Item

• COMPARISON OF REGULATORY SUBSTANTIVE EXAMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN IN FOOD PACKAGING DRAWINGS: An Indonesian and Japanese Study. (deposited 26 Mar 2026 06:34) [Currently Displayed]

Actions (login required)

View Item