PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG KREDITOR SEPARATIS TERKAIT MASUKNYA INVESTOR BARU YANG MENGENYAMPINGKAN KEABSAHAN RAPAT KREDITUR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI NOMOR 6 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015)

Wesly Erikson Siahaan, . (2025) PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG KREDITOR SEPARATIS TERKAIT MASUKNYA INVESTOR BARU YANG MENGENYAMPINGKAN KEABSAHAN RAPAT KREDITUR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI NOMOR 6 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015). Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (98kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (2MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (425kB)
[img] Text
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (559kB)
[img] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (458kB)
[img] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (686kB)
[img] Text
BAB 5.pdf
Download (12kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (290kB)
[img] Text
9. RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (152kB)
[img] Text
10. LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (3MB)
[img] Text
11. HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (13MB)
[img] Text
12. Article KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (231kB)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the suspension of debt payment obligations (PKPU) is resolved for separatist creditors by judges in relation to the disregard for the validity of the Creditors' Meeting due to the entry of a new investor in the case of Supreme Court Review Decision No. 6 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015, and how legal protection is provided for separatist creditors regarding the issue of new investors in the PKPU process to ensure justice and legal certainty. This research is a normative juridical study with a descriptive analytical specification. The data sources consist of secondary data, which are divided into primary and secondary legal materials. The data collection methods used were literature review and documentary research. The research concludes that the judge's action in extending the peace plan should have followed the quorum and voting procedures in accordance with Article 281 paragraph (1) b in conjunction with Article 285 of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law. The peace plan extension should not have been possible, as justice and legal protection for separatist creditors were not realized when the peace plan was extended because the right to execute could not be exercised in accordance with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law.

Item Type: Thesis (Tesis)
Additional Information: [No. Panggil : 2110622001] [Pembimbing 1 : Iwan Erar Joesoef] [Pembimbing 2 : Atik Winanti] [Penguji 1 : Heru Sugiyono] [Penguji 2 : Iwan Erar Joesoef
Uncontrolled Keywords: Validity of Creditors' Meeting, Legal Protection, Separatist Creditor, New Investor
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2)
Depositing User: WESLY ERIKSON SIAHAAN
Date Deposited: 29 Aug 2025 01:01
Last Modified: 29 Aug 2025 01:01
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/39988

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item