PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ORGAN DAN KORPORASI YAYASAN ATAS FRAUD BERUPA PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ASET PERTANAHAN YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN (Studi Putusan: Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi JAKARTA Nomor 202/PDT/2025/PT DKI)

Michael Giovanni Joseph, . (2025) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ORGAN DAN KORPORASI YAYASAN ATAS FRAUD BERUPA PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ASET PERTANAHAN YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN (Studi Putusan: Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi JAKARTA Nomor 202/PDT/2025/PT DKI). Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
Abstrak.pdf
Download (120kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (507kB)
[img] Text
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (579kB)
[img] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (409kB)
[img] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (566kB)
[img] Text
BAB 5.pdf
Download (286kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (307kB)
[img] Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (134kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (19MB)
[img] Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (224kB)

Abstract

Criminal liability in the foundation sector remains predominantly focused on individuals, while the role of legal entities as subjects of criminal law has not been fully optimized—particularly in cases involving educational foundations committing fraud through nominee agreements over land assets. These nominee arrangements are often used to circumvent legal restrictions on foundation land ownership, placing legal title under a third party while control remains with the foundation or its insiders. This practice contradicts the legal nature of foundations, which are designed to be non-profit and oriented toward public benefit, not private enrichment or commercial activity. This study examines the criminal liability of foundation organs engaged in such fraudulent practices and explores the dissolution of foundations under the Foundation Law and Indonesia’s 2023 Penal Code as a mechanism of corporate criminal accountability. Utilizing a normative legal method and case studies, the research is grounded in Peter Benson’s transactional justice theory—emphasizing fairness through equality of parties in contractual relationships—and Petter Gottschalk’s convenience theory of fraud, which highlights the role of motivation, opportunity, and rationalization within weak governance structures. Findings indicate that dissolving a foundation can serve both as a punitive and restorative tool, enabling the return of illicit gains to society through state-appointed management. Thus, there is an urgent need to reconstruct the application of corporate criminal law to foundations, including recognition of beneficial ownership and the alignment of dissolution mechanisms with principles of social justice.

Item Type: Thesis (Tesis)
Additional Information: [No. Panggil : 2310622018] [Pembimbing 1 : Handoyo Prasetyo] [Pembimbing 2 : Heru Sugiyono] [Penguji 1 : Handar Subhandi Bhaktiar] [Penguji 2 : Atik Winanti]
Uncontrolled Keywords: Educational foundations, Fraud, Nominee agreements, Criminal liability, Foundation dissolution, Indonesian Penal Code 2023, transactional justice.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2)
Depositing User: MICHAEL GIOVANNI JOSEPH
Date Deposited: 25 Aug 2025 01:43
Last Modified: 25 Aug 2025 01:43
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/39791

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item