Carissa Maharani Anwar, . (2024) ANALISIS YURIDIS NORMATIF PERANAN VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI SURAT DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![]() |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (115kB) |
![]() |
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (202kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (429kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (221kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (271kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (164kB) |
![]() |
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (235kB) |
![]() |
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (212kB) |
![]() |
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (294kB) |
![]() |
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (610kB) |
![]() |
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (635kB) |
Abstract
Rape cases are increasingly frequent, despite Article 285 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) stipulating severe penalties for perpetrators. However, in practice, Visum et Repertum as documentary evidence is often overlooked. One case highlighted is the acquittal in Supreme Court Decision Number 1602/K/PID/2015, which was analyzed to understand how judges evaluate Visum et Repertum and to assess its role, status, strength, and challenges in the preparation process. This research employs a normative juridical method with an analytical-deductive case-based approach. Legal materials used include Article 285 of the KUHP and the Supreme Court decision as primary sources, as well as journals and scholarly books as secondary sources. The analysis aims to identify gaps, conflicts, or ambiguities in legal norms. In this case, Visum et Repertum played a significant role, particularly in supporting the defendant's acquittal. Although not binding, its evidentiary strength weakens without additional support. Challenges in preparing Visum et Repertum include administrative errors, insufficient physical evidence, differing results across three examinations, as well as time constraints, lack of coordination among parties, social pressure, and costs. In this case, the judges placed greater confidence in the first visum, which indicated the absence of intercourse, leading to the defendant’s acquittal.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2110211059] [Pembimbing: Abdul Kolib] [Penguji 1: Isniani Ramadhani Sekar Prabarini] [Penguji 2: Melly Kristanti] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Normative Juridical, Visum et Repertum, Documentary Evidence, Proof, Rape, Acquittal |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Kedokteran > Program Studi Kedokteran (S1) |
Depositing User: | CARISSA MAHARANI ANWAR |
Date Deposited: | 07 Mar 2025 01:49 |
Last Modified: | 07 Mar 2025 01:49 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/34406 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |