Nadya Divandra Salsabiela, . (2024) PRAKTIK DISKRIMINASI PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (PERSERO) TBK DAN PT TELEKOMUNIKASI SELULER TERHADAP NETFLIX TERKAIT PENYEDIAAN LAYANAN AKSES INTERNET PROVIDER (Studi Kasus: Putusan KPPU Nomor 08/KPPU-I/2020). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (246kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (831kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (360kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (365kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (360kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (476kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (186kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (257kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (36kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (9MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (261kB) |
Abstract
Competition in the business sphere plays a very important role in driving the economic growth of a country. There is potential for unfair competition and monopolistic practices to arise due to the tight business competition in Indonesia. In an effort to provide legal clarity and promote fair business competition, Law No. 5 Year 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition (hereinafter referred to as Law No. 5 Year 1999) was established. As stipulated in Article 36 of Law No. 5 Year 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) has the authority to enforce the law against monopolistic practices and/or unfair business competition. The Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) Number 08/KPPU-I/2020 is one example of a case resolved by KPPU regarding the alleged Discriminatory Practices of PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Persero) Tbk and PT Telekomunikasi Seluler against Netflix regarding the Provision of Internet Access Provider Services. The research method used is normative juridical research in which data is taken based on literature studies using a case approach, statutory approach. Based on the results of this study, the Commission Panel decided that, although there was evidence of discriminatory violations against Netflix, there was no evidence that the company violated Article 19 letter d of the Law.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No.Panggil: 2010611221] [Pembimbing: Iwan Erar Joesoef] [Ketua Penguji : Suherman] [Penguji 1: Satino] [Penguji 2: Iwan Erar Joesoef] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | KPPU, Discriminatory Practices, Internet Access Services |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
Depositing User: | Nadya Divandra Salsabiela |
Date Deposited: | 08 Feb 2024 07:45 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2024 02:50 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/29295 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |