Malik Ibrahim, . (2022) PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA YANG MELAKUKAN IMPOR TELEPON GENGGAM SECARA TIDAK RESMI (PERBANDINGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA, MALAYSIA DAN JEPANG). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
Text
abstrak.pdf Download (126kB) |
|
Text
awal.pdf Download (3MB) |
|
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (229kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (274kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (160kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (351kB) |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (140kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (169kB) |
|
Text
Daftar Riwayat Hidup.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (103kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
hasil plagiarisme.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (8MB) |
|
Text
jurnal malik ibrahim.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (376kB) |
Abstract
Imported goods sent to a country do not necessarily have a permit or of icial tobetraded in that country. In this study, the question that will be answered is what arethe implications for the import of unof icial cellular phones by business actorswho are sold to consumers and how law enforcement and the dif erence betweenunof icial cellular phones by business actors are sold to consumers in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan. This research method uses normative juridical type. Theresults of the study show dif erent legal products from each country andtheirenforcement. In Indonesia, the impact of this forgery can be detrimental tostatetax revenues as well as economic instability. Thus, it is regulated by lawfromArticle 45 and Article 46 of the Consumer Protection Law to sanction a prisonerof a maximum of 2 years with a fine of Rp. 500,000,000.00. Malaysia is alsoaf ected by this black market, namely the decline in the state deficit due tothenon-disbursement of goods taxes. Law enforcement in Malaysia refers tothecounterfeiting rules based on the CopyRight Act 1987 with a prison sentenceof not more than 5 years and a fine of money. In addition, in Japan itself has theConsumer Protection Law of 2000 and its enforcement for people who carrycounterfeit and counterfeit goods based on article 167 with a prison fine of not more than 3 years. The conclusion that can be drawn is that each country, suchasIndonesia, Malaysia, and Japan, has its own way of enforcing the lawagainst thesale of unauthorized cell phones, but the impact can be the same.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No Panggil : 1810611175] [Ketua : Heru Suyanto] [Anggota 1 : Atik Winanti] [Anggota 2 : Heru Sugiyono] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Import, mobile phone, Indonesia |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
Depositing User: | Malik Ibrahim |
Date Deposited: | 11 Feb 2022 07:59 |
Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2022 07:59 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/16140 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |