Rezha Muhammad, . (2025) PERLINDUNGAN KREDITUR ATAS ITIKAD TIDAK BAIK DEBITUR DALAM PRAKTIK EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA TERHADAP DEBITUR WANPRESTASI (Studi Putusan No.182/Pdt.G/2023/Pn.Bpp). Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
|
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (145kB) |
|
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (963kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (571kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (420kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (929kB) |
|
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (16kB) |
|
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (326kB) |
|
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (184kB) |
|
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (13MB) |
|
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (117kB) |
Abstract
This research is entitled “Creditor Protection against Bad Faith in the Practice of Fiduciary Security Execution toward Defaulting Debtors (A Study of Decision No. 182/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Bpp)”. This study arises from the legal disharmony following the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, which restricts creditors’ authority to carry out parate execution, thereby creating legal uncertainty when debtors default and act in bad faith by refusing to comply with the execution of fiduciary collateral. The research problems examined are: (1) how the lawsuit for breach of contract concerning fiduciary collateral is implemented in Decision No. 182/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Bpp; and (2) how legal protection for creditors against debtors’ bad faith should be formulated after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that legal protection for creditors after the Constitutional Court Decision emphasizes preventive protection through the requirement of mutual agreement on execution, as well as repressive protection through court proceedings when debtors refuse execution. Decision No. 182/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Bpp demonstrates that the court interprets the Constitutional Court ruling as limiting parate execution, even when the debtor is proven to be in default. Therefore, strengthening regulations and judicial practices is necessary to ensure a balanced legal protection for both creditors and debtors.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Tesis) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil : 2210622007] [Pembimbing 1 : Suherman] [Pembimbing 2 : Iwan Erar Joesoef] [Penguji 1 : Heru Sugiyono] [Penguji 2 : Atik Winanti] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Fiduciary, Security execution, Creditor, Debtor |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2) |
| Depositing User: | REZHA MUHAMMAD |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2026 08:32 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Apr 2026 08:32 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/49688 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
