Khalisa Putri Khalila, . (2026) TANGGUNG JAWAB GOOGLE LLC DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA POSISI DOMINAN DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (158kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB I.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (287kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (244kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (520kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (290kB) |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (168kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (243kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (147kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (11MB) |
|
Text
Artikel KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (326kB) |
Abstract
Indonesia's competition law is established to maintain a healthy economy and improve societal welfare, despite facing challenges such as the shift to digital realms. To ensure fair competition, Indonesia has Law No. 5 of 1999, which, among other things, prohibits the abuse of dominant position. This provision becomes relevant when Google LLC, a U.S. based company, is alleged to have abused its dominance through the implementation of Google Play Billing, harming developers and consumers. This study aims to analyze the settlement of disputes involving the abuse of a dominant position by Google LLC in Indonesia and the United States, as well as to examine the company's responsibility to the parties harmed in the dispute. The research method used is normative juridical, employing statutory, comparative, and case approaches. The first finding reveals differences in competition law regulations between Indonesia (Law No. 5/1999, KPPU) and the U.S. (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, FTC/DOJ), with the U.S. Google LLC case providing consumer restitution via the Federal Trade Commission Act (amended by U.S. SAFE WEB Act 2006). The second finding indicates that KPPU Decision No. 03/KPPU-I-2024 does not address compensation for harmed consumers yet. Recommendations include strengthening the Anti-Monopoly Law to integrate consumer protection as in the U.S., and KPPU collaboration with digital agencies to fairly address digital dominance.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil : 2210611433] [Pembimbing : Heru Sugiyono] [Ketua Penguji : Davilla Prawidya Azaria] [Penguji 1 : Dwi Najah Tsirwiyati] [Penguji 2 : Heru Sugiyono] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Business competition; dominant position; Google |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
| Depositing User: | KHALISA PUTRI KHALILA |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Mar 2026 03:20 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Mar 2026 03:20 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/42440 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |