Muhammad Hanalfi Ibro, . (2025) STRATEGI ADVOKASI NGO INDONESIA CORRUPTION WATCH DALAM MENOLAK PENGESAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG KPK NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2019. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![]() |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (213kB) |
![]() |
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (498kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (505kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (300kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (266kB) |
![]() |
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (87kB) |
![]() |
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (919kB) |
![]() |
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (24MB) |
![]() |
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (556kB) |
Abstract
The ratification of the revision of Law No. 30 of 2002 into Law No. 19 of 2019 has sparked controversy because it could affect the institutional structure of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The theoretical framework of this study draws on the Advocacy Strategy theory by Gen and Wright (2016) and the Contentious Politics theory by McAdam, Tilly, and Tarrow (2001). The findings of this study indicate that ICW employed an Outside Strategy (within the outside/inside strategy framework), Direct Reform, Popular Power, and Indirect Pressure. In the context of the political opportunity structure, differences in interests and opinions were found between ICW and government institutions, the House of Representatives (DPR), and the Constitutional Court (MK). The regime's cohesion at the time created strong consolidation among elites, and there was a lack of harmony between the public and the government. For the framing process, ICW's advocacy framing process was found to be an action that generated many symbolic elements and had a sustainable nature. Efforts were made to gather the masses so that advocacy efforts could run smoothly. Despite embracing many participants, ICW had to face political obstacles, with the consolidation among political elites at that time posing a challenge for ICW.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2110413181] [Pembimbing: Ardli Johan Kusuma] [Penguji 1: Deni Angela] [Penguji 2: Aniqotul Ummah] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Indonesia Corruption Watch, Advocacy, Contentious Politics |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik > Program Studi Ilmu Politik (S1) |
Depositing User: | MUHAMMAD HANALFI IBRO |
Date Deposited: | 05 Sep 2025 15:24 |
Last Modified: | 05 Sep 2025 15:24 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/38877 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |