DISPARITAS PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TANPA HAK MEMBAWA SENJATA TAJAM DALAM PERSPEKTIF TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN

Benedictus Krisna Mukti, . (2025) DISPARITAS PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TANPA HAK MEMBAWA SENJATA TAJAM DALAM PERSPEKTIF TUJUAN PEMIDANAAN. Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (260kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (407kB)
[img] Text
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (583kB)
[img] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (280kB)
[img] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (469kB)
[img] Text
BAB 5.pdf
Download (258kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (471kB)
[img] Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (183kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (20MB)
[img] Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (725kB)

Abstract

As the main issue in this study was conducted to find out about the problem of why there is a disparity in sentencing decisions against criminal acts without the right to carry sharp weapons. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze how the sentencing decision against criminal acts without the right to carry sharp weapons containing disparity can achieve the theory of punishment and explain how the theory of proof of the occurrence of a sentencing decision against criminal acts without the right to carry sharp weapons states that there is a disparity. With a normative legal research method, and using two approaches, namely, the case approach and the sociological approach to law in providing justice to perpetrators of criminal acts. As in the case approach used, namely, Supreme Court Decision Number 1146 K / Pid.Sus / 2015; Supreme Court Decision Number 1070 K/Pid.Sus/2016; Supreme Court Decision Number 566 K/Pid.Sus/2017. With this case approach, the author in this case answers the main issue by using a sociological legal approach by describing criminal witnesses to each perpetrator of a crime so that the provision of justice to the perpetrator of a crime can have an impact on the disparity of sentencing decisions. By answering this issue, the Research Results are that with the three decisions of the panel of judges, the neoclassical school of thought prioritizes the neo-classical school because why in the neo-classical school in its main principle it says not only to protect the interests of society, but also to protect the interests of individuals or individuals, then there is a theory of evidence in analyzing the three decisions.

Item Type: Thesis (Tesis)
Additional Information: [No. Panggil : 2110622037] [Pembimbing : Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar] [Penguji 1 : Slamet Tri Wahyudi] [Penguji 2 : Beniharmoni Harefa
Uncontrolled Keywords: Disparity, Court Decisions, Sentencing Theories.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2)
Depositing User: BENEDICTUS KRISNA MUKTI
Date Deposited: 28 Feb 2025 03:23
Last Modified: 28 Feb 2025 03:23
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/36396

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item