Muhamad Nur Ajie Arie Achnuphi, . (2025) IMPLIKASI SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2015 DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA PERKARA NARKOTIKA. Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (250kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (930kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (456kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (672kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (296kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (604kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (172kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (468kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (124kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (16MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (13MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (659kB) |
Abstract
SEMA is not a binding regulation/regeling and has legal force that must be implemented, SEMA is merely guidance in the administration of justice, which is more administrative in nature. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of decisions on narcotics criminal cases that deviate from the provisions of the general minimum special criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges and the ideal concept of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting in 2015 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court in narcotics criminal cases class I. The type of research in this study is normative juridical supported by interviews with informants. The results of the study in this discussion are that the legal consequences of a narcotics criminal case decision deviating from the provisions of the special minimum general criminal law based on sufficient consideration by the Panel of Judges are decisions that are contrary to the principle of legality and cause disparities in judges' decisions for other cases that are identical to legal facts and conflicts of interest between the Public Prosecutor and the Panel of Judges in the trial. The ideal concept of the Circular of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court Chamber in 2015 as a Guideline for the Implementation of Duties for the Court in class I narcotics criminal cases is by making Changes to the Formulation of the Criminal Chamber Law on Narcotics in SEMA Number 3 of 2015 and changes to the Narcotics Law, especially in Article 112, so as not to cause multiple interpretations in the application of the law.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Tesis) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil : 2210622077] [Pembimbing 1 : Slamet Tri Wahyudi] [Pembimbing 2 : Supardi] [Penguji 1 : Handoyo Prasetyo] [Penguji 2 : Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | SEMA, Criminal Sanctions, Narcotics |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2) |
| Depositing User: | MUHAMAD NUR AJIE ARIE ACHNUPHI |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Feb 2025 01:49 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Feb 2025 01:49 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/35814 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |