Ghaitsa Zahira Shafa, . (2024) ANALISIS PEMILIHAN JASA KONSTRUKSI PERBAIKAN TALANG AIR, FIELD OF PLAY (FOP), DAN BANGUNAN PENDUKUNG PADA ISTORA PPKGBK MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DAN ZERO-ONE GOAL PROGRAMMING (ZOGP). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta.
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (315kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (685kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (730kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (347kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (260kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (209kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (5MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (12MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (568kB) |
Abstract
Istora PPKGBK needs construction services to repair damaged gutters, field of play (FOP), and supporting buildings. Istora needs a proposal for the best criteria as a company assessment of vendors, so the selected vendor is inconformity with the needs of the company. This research uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the priority level of criteria and vendors. The Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP) method is used to determine vendor selection decisions. Based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), it is found that the criteria with the highest priority are quality with a value of 35%, technical capabilities with a value of 31%, price with a value of 16%, performance history of 10%, and the criteria with the lowest value are warranties and claim policies with a value of 7%. While the highest priority vendors are vendor 2 with a final weight of 31%, vendor 6 with a final weight of 19%, vendor 1 with a final weight of 18%, vendor 7 with a final weight of 12%, vendor 3 with a final weight of 9%, vendor 5 with a final weight of 6%, and the vendor with the lowest weight is vendor 4 by 5%. Through the Zero-One Goal Programming (ZOGP), the vendor selection decision is obtained, namely vendor 2 (PT Karya Insani Sedjahtera) with value 1 (one).
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No.Panggil: 2010312094] [Pembimbing: Mohammad Rachman Waluyo] [Penguji 1: Reda Rizal] [Penguji 2: Donny Montreano] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Keywords : AHP, ZOGP, Vendor, FOP |
Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Teknik > Program Studi Teknik Industri (S1) |
Depositing User: | GHAITSA ZAHIRA SHAFA |
Date Deposited: | 01 Aug 2024 12:59 |
Last Modified: | 02 Aug 2024 04:46 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/31890 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |