Sulistyaning Karina Taradhanti, . (2026) PERBANDINGAN SANKSI HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN SATWA YANG DILINDUNGI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf.pdf Download (184kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf.pdf Download (641kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (302kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (278kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (243kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (337kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf.pdf Download (215kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf.pdf Download (219kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (125kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (390kB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (16MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (355kB) |
Abstract
Illegal trade in protected wildlife poses a serious threat to global biodiversity, necessitating strict and effective criminal sanctions at the national level. This thesis aims to analyze the legal regulations concerning protected wildlife trade offenses in Indonesia and Australia, as well as to compare the disparities in criminal sanctions based on each country's regulations. Employing a normative juridical approach with a comparative law method, this study examines Indonesia's Law No.5 of 1990 on Conservation of Living Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems along with related government regulations, compared to Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and its amendments. The research findings indicate that Indonesia regulates wildlife trade offenses under Article 40 of the Conservation Law with a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of IDR 5 billion, which is often general and lacks specificity for certain species. In contrast, Australia imposes more layered sanctions through the EPBC Act, including up to 10 years imprisonment, fines reaching 1000 penalties unit, along with strict liability enforcement. Substantive comparison reveals Australia's superiority in progressive financial penalties and corporate accountability, while Indonesia requires reforms to enhance law enforcement effectiveness in support of CITES implementation. The study concludes by recommending harmonization of Indonesian criminal sanctions with Australian standards through legislative revisions and strengthened inter-agency coordination.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2210611137] [Pembimbing: Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar] [Ketua Penguji: Bambang Waluyo] [Penguji 1: Abdul Kholiq] [Penguji 2: Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Protected wildlife trade, criminal sanctions, Indonesian law, Australian law, comparative law, CITES |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
| Depositing User: | SULISTYANING KARINA TARADHANTI |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Sep 2026 02:48 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Sep 2026 02:48 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/53636 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |