PERBANDINGAN INTERPRETASI PASAL 31 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2009 PADA KASUS KONTRAK BERBAHASA ASING DENGAN PILIHAN HUKUM INDONESIA

Mayang Talentasari Prananda, . (2026) PERBANDINGAN INTERPRETASI PASAL 31 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2009 PADA KASUS KONTRAK BERBAHASA ASING DENGAN PILIHAN HUKUM INDONESIA. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (128kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (267kB)
[img] Text
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (447kB)
[img] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (245kB)
[img] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (484kB)
[img] Text
BAB 5.pdf
Download (179kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (255kB)
[img] Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (328kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (16MB)
[img] Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (328kB)

Abstract

Indonesian is the official language of The Republic of Indonesia. As the official state language, Indonesia is commonly used in the drafting of agreements. However, the mandatory use of the Indonesian language in international contracts involving Indonesian parties has generated various interpretations due to the absence of explicit sanctions under Article 31 of Law Number 24 of 2009 concerning the National Flag, Language, State Emblem, and National Anthem. This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the comparative legal interpretations adopted by judicial panels in adjudicating disputes concerning the validity of foreign language contracts governed by Indonesian Law that are not accompanied by an Indonesia language version. Employing normative legal research with statutory and case approaches, this study examines three landmark court decisions characterized by distinct patterns of legal reasoning. The findings reveal a lack of uniformity in judicial approaches. First, the court adopted a strict grammatical interpretation, holding that the language requirement constitutes an objective validity requirement of an agreement. Second. The court applied a strict teleological interpretation, emphasizing the principles of good faith and party autonomy, thereby maintaining that an agreement remains valid and binding as long as its contents do not contravene the law. Third, the court likewise employed a teleological interpretation by construing the language requirement as a formal administrative defect in evidentiary proceedings, resulting in the claim being declared inadmissible. These divergent interpretations create legal uncertainty for contracting parties and the public at large. Therefore, notwithstanding the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2023, this study argues that additional sanctions for non-compliance with Article 31 of Law Number 24 of 2009 remain necessary to ensure legal certainty regarding language requirements in contractual agreements.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information: [No.Panggil: 2210611242] [Pembimbing: Surahmad] [Ketua Penguji : Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani] [Penguji 1:Satino] [Penguji 2: Surahmad]
Uncontrolled Keywords: Judicial Interpretation, Choice of Law, Validity of The Contract
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
K Law > KZ Law of Nations
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1)
Depositing User: MAYANG TALENTASARI PRANANDA
Date Deposited: 28 Aug 2026 03:56
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2026 03:56
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/52957

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item