URGENSI PEMBAYARAN RESTITUSI OLEH PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DALAM UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN

Guntur Adi Nugraha, . (2026) URGENSI PEMBAYARAN RESTITUSI OLEH PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DALAM UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN. Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (275kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (457kB)
[img] Text
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (663kB)
[img] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (317kB)
[img] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (420kB)
[img] Text
BAB 5.pdf
Download (241kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (667kB)
[img] Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (167kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (7MB)
[img] Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (15MB)
[img] Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (701kB)

Abstract

This research examines the urgency of restitution payments by human trafficking perpetrators to achieve substantive justice and legal protection for victims, focusing on the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 304/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Pst. Normatively, regulations such as Law No. 21/2007, Law No. 31/2014, PP No. 7/2018, and PERMA No. 1/2022 guarantee victims' restitution rights for material and immaterial losses. However, judicial practice reveals significant gaps, where restitution is often omitted from decisions despite requests by prosecutors and LPSK, as in the case involving commercial sex exploitation with losses of Rp207,803,000. Pusiknas Polri data (2025) records 404 TPPO cases with 427 victims, while LPSK received 439 restitution claims worth Rp7.49 billion in 2024, yet implementation remains weak due to lack of awareness, execution mechanisms, and restorative justice priority. Employing normative juridical approach with statute and case methods, supported by Aristotle's corrective justice, Rawls' justice as fairness, Bentham's utilitarianism, and legal protection theories by Hadjon and Rahardjo, key findings include judicial rationales for ignoring restitution, decision disparities, and novelties: (1) restitution as perpetrator's obligation (not substitutable by subsidiary penalties), compensation as state's duty; (2) integration into the New Criminal Code; (3) mandatory execution mechanisms. The study offers policy recommendations for lawmakers, law enforcers, and LPSK to optimize victim recovery in TPPO cases.

Item Type: Thesis (Tesis)
Additional Information: [No. Panggil : 2210622050] [Pembimbing 1 : Beniharmoni Harefa] [Pembimbing 2 : Slamet Tri Wahyudi] [Penguji 1 : Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar] [Penguji 2 : Handoyo Prasetyo]
Uncontrolled Keywords: Restitution, Human trafficking, Restorative justice, Victim protection, Substantive justice.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2)
Depositing User: GUNTUR ADI NUGRAHA
Date Deposited: 05 May 2026 06:54
Last Modified: 05 May 2026 06:54
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/50290

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item