Khalisyah Amara Podungge, . (2026) IMPLIKASI HUKUM PERDATA TERHADAP KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN YANG DIBUAT DI BAWAH TEKANAN (DURESS) ATAU PAKSAAN: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2935 K/PDT/2013. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf.pdf Download (116kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf.pdf Download (217kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (277kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (202kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (304kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf.pdf Download (148kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf.pdf Download (187kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (233kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (14MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (10MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (266kB) |
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the elements of pressure or duress in the formation of agreements and their legal implications under Indonesian civil law. The research focuses on the application of duress as regulated in Articles 1320 and 1321 of the Indonesian Civil Code, the principle of freedom of contract, and the doctrine of misbruik van omstandigheden, which provides a broader understanding of non-physical pressure and imbalanced bargaining positions. Using a normative juridical approach supported by a case study of Supreme Court Decision No. 2935 K/Pdt/2013, this study demonstrates that psychological pressure, investigative circumstances, threats of detention, and the exploitation of a weaker party constitute strong indicators of defective consent in contract formation. The findings also show that agreements concluded under duress may not only be annulled but may additionally result in other legal consequences, such as the loss of evidentiary force and the potential imposition of civil liability on the basis of tort. The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the role of law as a protective mechanism for vulnerable parties and reaffirms that the principle of freedom of contract is valid only when consent is given freely and voluntarily. Accordingly, this research highlights the need for stronger regulation and more consistent judicial application of the doctrine of defective consent to ensure substantive justice within contractual relations. Keywords: duress, pressure, defective consent, freedom of contract, misbruik van omstandigheden, agreement.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2210611473] [Pembimbing: Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani, S.H., M.H.] [Penguji 1: Dr. Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho, S.H., M.H.] [Penguji 2: Taupiqqurrahman, S.H., M.Kn.] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Keywords: duress, pressure, defective consent, freedom of contract, misbruik van omstandigheden, agreement. |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
| Depositing User: | KHALISYAH AMARA PODUNGGE |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Mar 2026 02:50 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Mar 2026 02:50 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/42630 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |