Muhamad Afif Kafandi, . (2024) KERANGKA KONSTITUSIONAL KEWENANGAN DPD DALAM SISTEM PERWAKILAN INDONESIA (Studi Pelaksanaan Kewenangan DPD Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012). Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (258kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (758kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (266kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (236kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (162kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (524kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (36kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (181kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (93kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (18MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (206kB) |
Abstract
The Regional Representative Council (DPD) is a representative institution that is a manifestation of the implementation of the bicameral system (two-chamber representation) in Indonesia. However, as the second chamber, the Regional Representative Council (DPD) is very limited in carrying out its role; the Regional Representative Council (DPD) has fragile authority compared to the DPR, so this causes the Indonesian representative system to be said to be implementing soft bicameralism/weak bicameral. This study aims to identify, know, and understand the Implementation of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) in exercising its authority after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 92/PUU-X/2012. In achieving this goal, this study uses a normative method, including research on legal norms, both the 1945 Constitution and regulations below it, with a statute approach, a historical approach that originates from laws and regulations related to the legal issues studied and examines the development of legal products based on the sequence of periodization or historical facts that underlie it. Law Number 17 of 2014 and the 2014 DPR Rules of Procedure are evidence that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 92/PUU-X/2012 has been accommodated, which, in essence designs the legislative process into a tripartite model, namely the DPR, DPD, and the President, who are equal from the beginning to the end of the Level I Discussion stage. In the Level II Discussion, the Regional Representative Council (DPD) conveys its opinion before the approval or ratification of the Bill into Law between the DPR and the President in a plenary meeting of the DPR. However, the Regional Representative Council (DPD) is separate from the ratification of the Bill into Law. Related to the ideal Strengthening of the legislative authority of the Regional Representative Council (DPD), further amendments are needed, namely, the fifth amendment, to emphasize the authority and function of legislation that is as strong as its ideals or the DPR must dare to share tasks with the Regional Representative Council (DPD) in legislation in order to achieve a proper checks and balances system.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Tesis) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2210622011} [Pembimbing 1: Wicipto Setiadi] [Pembimbing 2: Ahmad Ahsin Thohari] [Penguji 1: Taufiqurrohman Syahuri] [Penguji 2: Mas Pungky Hendra Wijaya] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Representative Institution, Bicameral, Legislation |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2) |
| Depositing User: | MUHAMAD AFIF KAFANDI |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2025 08:57 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Feb 2025 07:13 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/36236 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |