Doddy M. Abdullah K, . (2023) ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KEWENANGAN SITA ATAS OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bengkalis Nomor : 4/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bls). Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
Text
ABSTRACT.pdf Download (76kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (513kB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (424kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (303kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (167kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (298kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (137kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (145kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (123kB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIAT.PDF Restricted to Repository staff only Download (13MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (503kB) |
Abstract
This thesis research discusses the forced withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects by creditors against debtors. Given the nature of the financing agreement contains a principal agreement in the form of debt and credit, financing services also require adequate guarantees as referred to as fiduciary guarantees. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal consequences of the execution of fiduciary guarantee objects that are not in accordance with procedures and justice on the basis of judges' judgments of judex facti in deciding acts against the law contained in the Bengkalis District Court Decision Number : 4/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bls. This research is a normative legal research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Types of legal materials obtained from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, collected through library research, analyzed qualitatively, with a deductive conclusion technique. The formulation of the problem in this study is regarding how the authority to confiscate fiduciary guarantee objects, as well as the legal consequences arising from the execution of fiduciary guarantees that are not in accordance with the procedure is an illegal act, because carrying out the wrong execution procedure is contrary to the regulations regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees from time to time, namely (Law Number 42 of 1999 in Article 29 Chapter V concerning Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees and Article 196 HIR), Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/20 19 and Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 71/PUU-XIX/2021.
Item Type: | Thesis (Tesis) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No. Panggil : 2110622004] [Pembimbing : Suherman] [Penguji 1 : Atik Winarti] [Penguji 2 : Iwan Erar Joesoef] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees, Unlawful Acts, Justice. |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2) |
Depositing User: | Doddy M Abdullah K SH |
Date Deposited: | 17 Apr 2024 01:04 |
Last Modified: | 19 Apr 2024 01:54 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/29883 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |