Rif'at, . (2024) KEPASTIAN HUKUM UPAYA HUKUM PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 23/PUU-XIX/2021 (ANALISA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR: 647 K/PDT- SUS-PAILIT/2021). Tesis thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
Text
ABSTRAK .pdf Download (113kB) |
|
Text
AWAL (1).pdf Download (4MB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (286kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (411kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (192kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (278kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (59kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA .pdf Download (225kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (112kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (2MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (14MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (437kB) |
Abstract
The Judge's decision should also provide balanced justice for Insurance Customers who ask for their rights against the Insurance Company, considering that the Insurance Customer has asked the OJK to submit a PKPU and Bankruptcy application against the Insurance Company but did not get an answer from the OJK, resulting in a legal vacuum regarding further efforts that can be made by the Customer in obtaining their rights from the Insurance Company. This study aims to determine the legal certainty of the Supreme Court cassation decision Number: 647 K/Pdt- Sus-Bankruptcy/2021 after the Constitutional Court decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021, this research is a normative juridical research, the results of this study indicate that there are several possibilities that occur, legal certainty after the Constitutional Court decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 against Supreme Court decision Number: 647 K/Pdt- Sus-Bankruptcy/2021 which opens up space for an exclusive cassation appeal to the debtor against bankruptcy originating from PKPU due to the rejection of a peace proposal to overcome the legal loophole for deviations made by creditors who have moral hazard to bankrupt the debtor, is not legally reasonable. The contradiction between these two decisions (legal antinomy) above, according to legal experts, will be returned to legal principles, in this case the principle of lex posteriori derogat legi priori (the new law overrides the old law) which is used as a solution to resolve the contradiction of the above legal rules.
Item Type: | Thesis (Tesis) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 2110622031} [Pembimbing: Taufiqurrohman Syahuri] [Penguji 1: Suherman] [Penguji 2: Heru Sugiyono] |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation, Legal Remedies, Judge's Decision. |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S2) |
Depositing User: | Rif'at - |
Date Deposited: | 01 Mar 2024 02:47 |
Last Modified: | 01 Mar 2024 02:47 |
URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/29685 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |