TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT DALAM MEMUTUS SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR 757/PDT.G/2022/PN JKT.PST)

Alban Melkysedek Pamungkas Simanjuntak, . (2024) TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT DALAM MEMUTUS SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR 757/PDT.G/2022/PN JKT.PST). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

[img] Text
ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (107kB)
[img] Text
AWAL.pdf
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (226kB)
[img] Text
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (333kB)
[img] Text
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (163kB)
[img] Text
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (228kB)
[img] Text
BAB 5.pdf
Download (156kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (163kB)
[img] Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (187kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only
Download (339kB)
[img] Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (10MB)
[img] Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (219kB)

Abstract

Indonesia as a democratic country implements people's sovereignty through the election process which is held every 5 (five) years as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as the state constitution. This research aims to conduct a study of Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN JKT.PST which has an impact on the postponement of the Election and the basis for its consideration. This research is classified as qualitative research, using a normative approach through legislative approaches and case studies of court decisions, and is based on secondary data sources originating from data collection from literature materials, which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of this research show that Decision 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN JKT.PST is not relevant considering that Election Process disputes are the authority of the State Administrative Court based on Article 466 and Article 470 of the Jo Election Law. Article 4 paragraph (1) letter d of the Government Administration Law which is strengthened by Article 2 paragraph (1) of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019; Granting the decision to postpone the election and executing the uitvoerbaar bij voorraad decision is the main factor why the a quo decision is irrelevant. In its considerations, it was discovered that the Panel of Judges only focused on civil matters and were of the opinion that in order to fill the legal vacuum in resolving the problems mentioned by the PRIMA Party in the a quo case, the General Court institution must declare the authority to examine and decide on the a quo case.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information: [No. Panggil: 1910611060] [Pembimbing: Citraresmi Widoretno Putri] [Ketua Penguji : Taufiqurrohman Syahuri [Penguji 1: Ali Imran Nasution] [Penguji 2: Citraresmi Widoretno Putri]
Uncontrolled Keywords: Irrelevant. Election. Court Authority. Judge's Decision.
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1)
Depositing User: Alban Melkysedek Pamungkas Simanjuntak
Date Deposited: 08 Mar 2024 04:27
Last Modified: 08 Mar 2024 04:27
URI: http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/29653

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item