Yosephine Patricia, . (2023) ANALISIS PENERAPAN JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 798/Pid.B/2022/PN JKT.SEL. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (472kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Download (509kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (505kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (540kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (535kB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (471kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (477kB) |
|
Text
RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (364kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
HASIL PLAGIARISME.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (9MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL KI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (373kB) |
Abstract
In every existing criminal trial, witnesses have an important role. Because the information given by witnesses can often influence the judge in making a decision. In the Criminal Procedure Code, a witness is someone who gives information for the purposes of investigation, prosecution and trial in a criminal case that he himself witnessed or experienced. One of the pieces of evidence that is considered valid and used in court is witness testimony. where one of the witnesses is a witness who works together or a justice collaborator (JC). Until now, the application of JC has been widely used in the settlement of special crimes. However, recently JC was applied in assisting the settlement of common crimes, namely murder, namely the Bharada Richard Eliezer case in Decision Number 798/Pid.B/2022/PN. Jkt. Cell. The purpose of this research is to find out the application of the Justice Collaborator (JC) in the decision is in accordance with Indonesian Positive Law and also to know the judge's considerations in the decision. This research method uses normative legal research, with the data collection method used in this research is library research supplemented by interviews. Based on the results of this study, until now JC has not been regulated in such a way in the law. Until now the regulations governing JC are as follows: SEMA Number 4 of 2011, Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning the protection of witnesses and victims (UU PSK), United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), Law Number 31 of 1999 juncto Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes (UU TIPIKOR), Joint Regulation of the Minister of Law and Defense, Attorney General, National Police Chief, KPK, Chairman of LPSK. Based on the explanation above, the application of JC in decision number 798/pid.b/2022/pn.jkt.sel is not in accordance with existing regulations. Therefore, the application of JC can be said to be legally flawed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No. Panggil: 1910611228] [Pembimbing: Mulyadi] [Ketua Penguji : Slamet Tri Wahyudi] [Penguji 1: Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba] [Penguji 2: Mulyadi] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Witness, Criminal Act, Justice Collaborator |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Program Studi Hukum (S1) |
| Depositing User: | Yosephine Patricia |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Aug 2023 03:51 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Aug 2023 03:51 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/26476 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |