Januar Syarifudin Ramdan, . (2021) PENGARUH INTENSITAS PROMOSI TERHADAP EKUITAS MEREK DAN KUALITAS LAYANAN SEBAGAI KEPUTUSAN PENGGUNAAN SHOPEEPAY (Studi Kasus Terhadap Pengguna ShopeePay di Kec. Duren Sawit Jakarta Timur). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.
![[img]](http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
ABSTRAK.pdf Download (12kB) |
|
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (2MB) |
|
Text
BAB 1.pdf Download (626kB) |
|
Text
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (402kB) |
|
Text
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (411kB) |
|
Text
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB 5.pdf Download (130kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (238kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (20kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository UPNVJ Only Download (3MB) |
|
Text
ARTIKEL.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
This study aims to prove and analyze the direct and indirect effect between promotion intensity, brand equity and service quality on the ShopeePay usage decision. The population of this research is ShopeePay users in the Kec. Duren Sawit, with a sample of 40 respondents based on the Proporsinate Stratified Random Sampling technique. This research is quantitative, with Structural Equation Modeling analysis in Partial Least Square method and using SmartPLS3.3 application. The Outer Model explains, the validity value (AVE) is above 0.5, the composite reliability value is above 0.7, the R-Square Adjusted is 57.3% for the usage decision, and has a model fit (NFI) of 69.3%. The Iner Model explains, (1)the direct effect of promotion intensity on usage decisions is 0.258 positive but not significant. (2)the direct effect of promotion intensity on brand equity is 0.732 positive and significant. And (3)the direct effect of promotion intensity on service quality is -0.168 negatif not significant. Furthermore, (4)the direct effect of brand equity on the usage decision is 0.572 positive and significant. And (5)the direct effect of service quality on the usage decision is 0.098 positive but not significant. Then, (6)the indirect effect of promotion intensity on the usage decision through brand equity is 0.419 positive and significant. Meanwhile, (7)the indirect effect of promotion intensity on the usage decision through service quality is -0.016 negative not significant. Keywords : Promotion Intensity, Brand Equity, Service Quality, Usage Decision, ShopeePay
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | [No.Panggil: 1710111203] [Pembimbing: Lina Ariani] [Penguji 1: Anastasia Bernadin Dwi] [Penguji 2: Heni Nastiti] |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Promotion Intensity, Brand Equity, Service Quality, Usage Decision, ShopeePay |
| Subjects: | A General Works > AS Academies and learned societies (General) D History General and Old World > DS Asia H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions L Education > L Education (General) L Education > LG Individual institutions (Asia. Africa) P Language and Literature > PK Indo-Iranian |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis > Program Studi Manajemen (S1) |
| Depositing User: | Januar Syarifudin Ramdan |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Jul 2022 07:47 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Jul 2022 07:47 |
| URI: | http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/12791 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |